Arkib untuk Kategori Siapa Wahabi

THE WAHABIA MOVEMENT:The True Image (Part 4)

Posted in Siapa Wahabi on September 20, 2006 by bankwahabi


The True Image


Prepared by

Al-Ghadeer Center for Islamic Studies

Translated from Arabic by

Hamid S.Atiyyah, Ph.D.


The Wahabi doctrine regarding divine attributes


The Wahabi doctrine on Allah’s attributes is the same as that of al-Mujasima: * They claim that Allah possesses actual organs such as a hand, a leg, an eye and a face. They also describe him as literally siting, moving, changing position, descending and ascending. 8


This doctrine which they borrowed from Ibn Taimia originated with the Hoshawia who lacked profound knowledge of Islamic tenets and teachings. The Hashawia endorsed the literal meanings of religious texts and their


AI-Mujasima or anthropomorphise believed that Allah possessed physical attributes.


tajseem is similar to that of some Jewish denominations.


The Wahabis failed to support this belief with a single testimony by any of the Companions or early Muslims. But this did not deter them from claiming that this belief represents the consensus of early Muslims. In any case, their argument in defense of their belief regarding divine attributes lacks logical substance and hence it is unconvincing.


To justify their belief, however, the Wahabis relied entirely on a statement by Ibn Taimia who claimed that after reviewing all available commentaries by the Companions and the traditions reported by them and collected from several sources which amounted to more than 100 commentaries he could not find a single evidence from one Companion inter­preting the attributes’ verses in varinace with their literal meanings. 9

This allegation repeated by Ibn Taimia is false and was clearly refuted by the same sources whose authenticity and reliability were confirmed by Ibn Taimia himself. These sources include the commentaries of al-Tabari, Ibn Atia and al-Bagawi. 10


All of these sources reported that the Companions interpreted the Quranic verses on Allah’s attributes and did not endorse their literal meanings. To illustrate, Ayat al-Kursi or Chair verse was interpreted by AI-Tabari, Ibn Atia and al-Bagawi by referring to Ibn Abbas’ comment that the chair means Allah’s knowledge. Ibn Atia upheld this and regarded any other interpretation to be of Jewish or Hashawi origin which must be ignored. 11


In the same fashion, Allah’s ‘face’ is interpreted in all verses in which mention of it is found as purpose, recompense or other meanings depending on its context. Anyone can check al-Bagawi’s commentary which Ibn Taimia praised as utterly reliable to find out for himself that Ibn Taimia’s claim is unfounded. In specific, al-Bagawi’s commentaries on the following verses may be consulted: The Cow: 115, 255 and 272; Thunder: 22; The Narratives: 88; The Romans: 38, 39; The Man: 9; and the Night: 2. From this evidence it can be concluded that the companions did not support the Wahabi’s doctrine on divine attributes.



THE WAHABIA MOVEMENT:The True Image (Part 3)

Posted in Siapa Wahabi on September 20, 2006 by bankwahabi


The True Image


Prepared by

Al-Ghadeer Center for Islamic Studies

Translated from Arabic by

Hamid S.Atiyyah, Ph.D.


The Wahabi doctrine on the Prophet Companions


1. As indicated earlier, the Wahabi effectively charged most of the Prophet Companions with idolatry and heresy because they continued, after the Prophet’s death, to allow asking for his intercession and visiting his tomb. They also included in this category all those who condoned this practice or knew about it and did not brand it as an idolatry and heresy which is punishable by death and loss of possessions.


This is their true doctrine which con­tradicts their claim of holding the Prophet’s Companions in the highest position.


2. The Wahabi went further than this by directly attacking the Companions who followed the Prophet. Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab, the founder of the Wahabi sect, asserted that:

.. a group of Companions who fought with the Prophet, prayed, paid alms, fasted and made pilgrimage with him were, in fact, heretics and distant from Islam.7


3. It is unsurprising, therefore, for the Wahabi writers and scholars to go to an extreme in defending Yazid ibn Muawiya* whose deeds altest to his animosity to the Companions. It was Yazid’s army who sacked al-Medina at al-Hara battle in which countless Companions were murdered and their women raped. It is reported that in the aftermoth of this one thousand unwed girls became pregnant.


Before that, Yazid’s soldiers had committed the atrocious crime of murdering

He is the second Umayyid Caliph appointed by his father Muawiya as his successor.


eighteen members of the Prophet Household at Kerbala including his grandson, al-Hussain, a number of his brothers, and their sons including children and new born infants.


During the reign of Yazid also, Mecca was sacked and Al-Kaba set on fire. In spite of these, the Wahabi applaud Yazid in their writings which can only mean that they condone his deeds. They also blatantly ignore the documented accounts confirming that Yazid did not perform obligatory prayers and drank alcohol. For these transgressions alone, they should have declared him a heretic in accordance with Imam Ahmed’s teachings which they claim to follow. Instead of this they praise Yazid and condemn all those who ask for the Prophet’s intercession including the Companions as heretics.



THE WAHABIA MOVEMENT:The True Image (Part 2)

Posted in Siapa Wahabi on September 20, 2006 by bankwahabi


The True Image


Prepared by

Al-Ghadeer Center for Islamic Studies

Translated from Arabic by

Hamid S.Atiyyah, Ph.D.



Sources of Wahabi thought


The Wahabi sect classified doctrines into two categories. The first category includes all those doctrines based on a text in the Quran or the Prophet Tradition. They claimed that such doctrines can be derived from these two sources directly and without resorting to the logical deductions of religious scholars regarding their meaning – even if these sources happen to be the Prophet’s Companions, early Muslims or other scholars.


The second category includes all doctrines which are not based on a Quranic or Prophetic text, and in such cases the Wahabis claim that they defer to the teachings and jurisprudence of Imam Ahmed ibn Hanbal and Ibn Taimia.


Regrettably, they failed in both categories by falling into contradictions and making gross errors of judgement as the following points show:


1. They relied entirely on interpretations based on the literal meaning of the texts, and thus they contradicted basic tenets and ijam, the consensus of religious scholars. This is why the Egyptian religious scholar of the last century, Muhammad Abdo, described them as worse than those who follow others blindly because they “believe that the literal meanings must be endorsed and adhered to without paying heed to the basic tenets on which religion is based. ,2


2. They contradicted Ahmed ibn Hanbal clearly and openly in pronouncing as blas­phemers and heretics Muslims who disagreed with them though none of Ibn Hanbal’s religious decrees support this. According to Ibn Hanbal, only a Muslim who intention­ally refuses to perform obligatory prayers can be called a blasphemer or heretic.


Similarly, no support for this Wahabi belief can be found in the works of Ibn Taimia. Indeed, Ibn Taimia opposed such thinking. He maintained that “whoever approved of those in agreement with him and condemned those who opposed him, created schisms in the ranks of Muslims, labelled those who disagreed with him regarding points of opinion and logical deduction as heretics, and approved waging was on them is a person who seeks to divide and create discord.” This description by Ibn Taimia fits the Wahabis completely.


3. If the Wahabi doctrine on visiting shrines is endorsed then Imam Ahmed ibn Hanbal and all his followers are idolators who must be denounced and their lives and possessions legally forfeited. This is in view of a report by none other than Ibn Taimia that Imam Ibn Hanbal wrote a treatise on visiting the shrine of Imam al-Hussain ibn Ali (the grandson of the Prophet) at Kerbala with specific instructions for visitors. Ibn Taimia commented on this that <<people at the time of Imam Ahmed [ibn Hanbal] frequented [the shrine].>> 4


But the Wahabi creed considers making a journey to a shrine for the purpose of visiting it a form of idolatry which deserve the extreme punishment of loss of life and possessions. In effect, they condemned Imam Ahmed, his contemporaries and early Muslims who practiced this ritual and condoned it as idolators who must be put to death and their possessions confiscated. Furthermore, this Wahabi decree must also extend to the Prophet Companions who approved or performed this ritual. Their claim to be followers of Imam Ahmed is thus unfounded.


The same argument applies also to their belief regarding asking for the Prophet’s intercession. According to this, whoever asks for the Prophet intercession after the Prophet’s death is committing a cardinal idolatry. They argue that by performing such an act, a person treats the Prophet as an idol and worships him instead of Allah. According, they considered killing such a person and confiscating his possessions a religious duty.


This Wahabi doctrine runs contrary to the practice of asking for the Prophet’s intercession performed by a large number of his prominent Companions and early Muslims – whose requests, the subjects of these intercessions, were usually granted. Ibn Taimia has confirmed this in his book Al-Ziara on the bases of evidence by several authorities including al-Baihaqi, al-Tabarani, Ahmed ibn Hanbal and Ibn Abi al-Dunia. 6 Nevertheless, Ibn Taimia chose to go against these authorities by banning the call for intercession. Unlike the Wahabi, however, he refrained from calling it a cardinal act of idolatry.


To repeat, if the Wahabi doctrine regarding intercession is endorsed then all the Companions and early Muslims who practiced it must be considered idolaters who desrve to be put to death. Not only those are idolaters, according to the Wahabi, but also anyone who knew about this practice and refrained from opposing it and condemning those who performed it as heretics. These also must be executed and their possessions forfeited. In the final analysis, all early Muslims deserve such a sentence leaving none whom the Wahabi could regard as the model to emulate.



THE WAHABIA MOVEMENT:The True Image (Part 1)

Posted in Siapa Wahabi on September 20, 2006 by bankwahabi


The True Image


Prepared by

Al-Ghadeer Center for Islamic Studies

Translated from Arabic by

Hamid S.Atiyyah, Ph.D.


© All rights of publication and printing reserved, 1416AH, 1995AD


Published by Al-Ghadeer for studies and publications Address: Harat Hurayk, Dak ash street, Fadhil-Allah and Ridha building, Blook B, First Floor, P.O.Box 50-24, Beirut Lebanon



1 AI-Wahabia and its founder

2 Origins of Wahabi thought

3 Sources of Wahabi thought

4 The Wahabi doctrine on the Prophet


5 The Wahabi doctrine regarding Divine attributes

6 The Wahabi and Muslims: the Wahabi bida (corruption)

7 The Wahabi and the Khawarij

8 The Wahabi and the Ghulat (extremists)

9 Whom does the Wahabi serve?

10. The true faith regarding visiting the

Prophet’s tomb and asking for his intercession

11 Anti-Wahabi books References



AI-Wahabia and Its Founder

The Wahabi sect was founded by Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab ibn Suleiman al-Najdi (1111 – 1206 AH.). After obtaining fundamental religious training he developed a special interest in books on false Prophets such as Musailama al-Kathab, Sajah al-Aswad al-An’si and Tulaiha al-Assadi. In the early period of his scholarship his father and tutors became aware of his deviant thinking and this led them to warn people of him by saying: “This man will go astray and will mislead those whom Allah wish to keep distant [from Him] and torment.”


In 1143 AH. Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab called upon the people of Najd to follow his new doctrine. However, his father and religious teachers rehmently opposed him and publicly refuted his ideas. Consequently, his mission remained unpopular until his father’s death ten years later. At that time he resumed his preaching and a small group of villagers followed him. Most of the villagers were, however, incensed by this and tried to kill him. He was thus, forced to flee to another town, Uyayna, where he won the favour of its ruler by marrying his sister. He remained there preaching his new doctrines until the indignant population drove him out. In al-Daria in eastern Najid he finally found permanent refuge. As a historical footnote it should be remembered that this was the land of the false prophet Musailama and the birthplace of the rada or apostatsy movement after the Prophet’s death. Ibn Abdul Wahab’s ideas fell on fertile ground in the town of al-Daria and its ruler, Muhammad ibn Saud, and most of its inhabitants converted to the new doctrine.


At that time Ibn Abdul Wahab behaved as if he had absolute monopoly over ijtihad, ie the ability to arrive at logical deductions on religious questions. In reality however, Ibn Abdul Wahab lacked the basic prerequisites that could qualify him to the rank of ijtihad. This was the opinion of his brother; Sulaiman, who knew him closely and authored a book refuting his brother’s invocation and demon­strating its falsehood. His book includes the following passage which concisely sums up the Wahabia and its founder: 1


At present people are plagued by someone who claims to follow the Holy Quran and al-Sunna (the Prophet Tradition) and dares to deduce from their teachings paying no heed to any opposition. Because anyone who opposses him [he calls] a heretic although he possesses none of the qualifications of the mujtahedeen – and, 1 swear by Allah, not even one tenth of one of these qualifications. In spite of this, his teachings have attracted many simpletons. To Allah we belong and shall return


Origins of Wahabi thought

The Wahabi sect has two basic tenets, a declared tenet and a hidden one. The declared tenet is commitment to divine unity and opposition to idolatry and paganism. But as we shall see later, this commitment is not confirmed by the actual history of the Wahabi.


The hidden tenet is sowing the seeds of schism, discord, conflict and war among Muslims to serve the goals of foreign domination. This is the real purpose which the Wahabia has sought to achieve since its inception and until the present day. This means that the declared objective or tenet served only to impress followers and enlist their efforts in achieving the real objective.


Undoubtedly the slogan of reviving the concept of divine unity and opposing idolatry has its attraction, and followers can be expected to rally around it with enthusiasm but without being aware that it is only a camouflage for the real hidden purpose.


Experts on the history of the Wahabia confirm that the movement was originally established upon an order by the British colonial administration. The list of authori­tative sources supporting this conclusion is long and includes Saint John Philpy in The History of Najd, Khairi Hamad in The Pillars of Colonialism, Hamaion Himayati in Al-Wahabi Criticism and Analysis, and finally, Haiem Wiseman, the first prime minister of the Jewish entity in Palestine in his memoirs.




End Muslim Terrorism by Ending Wahabism Influence in Saudi Arabia

Posted in Siapa Wahabi on September 20, 2006 by bankwahabi

End Muslim Terrorism by Ending Wahabism Influence in Saudi Arabia

Guest Column- by Hari Sud

A.     Introduction 

Osama bin Laden, Talibaan Chief Mullah Mohammed Omar, Chief Suspect in Daniel Pearl’s murder, Omar Saeed are all followers of Mohammed Abdul Al Wahab, the eighteenth century fundamentalist Mullah (cleric) in present day Saudi Arabia.  His view was, that since the time of Prophet Mohammed the followers of the faith have strayed away from his teachings, hence they have to be refocused back to what Prophet Mohammed said in Qoran.  Influence of Wahab’s word, spread in Saudi Arabia during his lifetime.  But the Ottomans, rulers of Arabia at that time, who originally are Central Asian Turks and Sunnis, did not encourage this firebrand Mullah.  They set out to completely smash his small band of followers, locally called Wahabis. Ottomans did not succeed very well; hence Wahabi’s influence remained strong with Mullahs who control the Muslim holy sites and Mosques in and around Arabia.  Wahabis have spent last 300 years waiting for an opportune time to gain political influence.

The opportunity came during WW I, when Britain looking for local support within Arabia, Transjordan and Iraq for war against Ottomans found two competing princes for power in Arabia. They had to choose one for their backing.  Prince Ibn Rashid lorded over one era of the Arabia (close to present day Iraq) and Prince/Emir Faisal maintained influence in Western end of the desert.  They spent their life as Bedouin nomads; hence Ottoman had difficulty catching them.  Briton dispatched Gertrude Bell (later called Desert Queen) to prince Rashid’s camp. She was the first ever lady intelligence officer, Briton had sent on an overseas mission, partly because she had lived in Middle East and partly she was daring in the mold of the proverbial Indiana Jones. She undertook a four-week journey to reach Prince Rashid’s camp through an uncharted desert with a group of Bedouin guards. There she found Rashid’s camp divided and decimated by family feuds over women and spoils of raids.  She reported her findings back to her British masters.  Dissatisfied with Rashid, British sent a second mission lead by T.E. Lawrence (popularly called Lawrence of Arabia) to feel Prince Faisal. Lawrence found Prince Faisal a valuable ally, worthy of British military and technical aid. This alliance resulted in a series of victories for Lawrence & Faisal and a complete rout of Ottoman in Middle East. Thereafter states of Iraq, Syria, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia were born (after a long difficult Paris conference in 1919).

Prince Faisal, to broaden his support, aligned himself with the Wahabi Mullahs of Arabia peninsula. With this alliance, Wahabis gained influence within the ruling circles of Prince later King Faisal and became the interpreter of the Islamic ideology in Arabia. King Faisal’s successors not only maintained this alliance but also with the arrival of Petro-dollars, enhanced it by giving them monies to build, maintain Muslim holy sites.  This increased Mullah’s influence ten fold. Extra Petro-dollars at Mullah’s disposal gave them ideas of exerting influence outside Arabia in same manner as Pope exerts influence over the Roman Catholics world over from Rome.

B.     Wahabis in Arabia and their Influence with the Ruling Princes

All Saudi princes including the king Fahad are Wahabis. They grew up in schools and education system run by Wahabis. Western education to some of them has not changed their outlook.  Saudi King(s) have created a special government department which looks after all the religious affairs including Hajj pilgrimage, the up keep of Grand Mosques in Mecca and Madina, free printing and distribution of Qoran in native languages, distribution of cash within Arabia and outside Arabia. The latter is key to galvanizing Muslims in their home countries. With cash at their disposal the local Mullahs are free to open Madarssa (religious school), repair Mosque, build new Mosque and help terrorists find shelter, food money and training. Madarssa curriculum is based on Wahabi teachings.

From 1973 – 2001, the price of oil scaled new height; hence more money became available to be distributed through out the Muslim world.  All teachers of the Madarassas, Mullahs of the Mosques under pretext of Hajj pilgrimage underwent Wahabi training in religious schools in Saudi Arabia. Care was taken not to indulge in political propaganda to alarm the home country government.  The latter was left for the mullah’s and teacher to undertake after their return.

With the soviet invasion of Afghanistan, the Saudis involved themselves in a, first war of the twentieth century against the infidel. To this, they were encouraged by the USA. Open call was given to Muslim all over the world to come to Afghan’s rescue. They did come and came in large numbers. The military hardware was paid for by USA, it was facilitated thru Pakistan by the Pakistani Government. Saudi’s paid for their religious indoctrination and recruitment thru the Mosques and Madarssas built by them all over the world.

C.     What is Wahabism all about 

Al Wahab in his teachings wished to arrest the decadence in the Muslim society and infuse vitality in it. In its original form it was a reformist movement. It rejected Sufism & saint worship and advocated return to the original teachings of Islam incorporated in the Qoran. He wished to liberate Islam from previous 1400 years of interpretations and distortions of the medieval times. He wished Muslim to go back to the fundamentals.

In a way he was turning the clock back on 1400 years of evolution.

To get a better understanding of Al Wahab message, please go to the following references:

In this simple message, Al Wahab set in motion events, which lead to present day religious and political alignment in Arabia and influence outside its borders. It is the interpretation, which matters. Theologians differ in its true meaning and the underline meaning. But there is only one conclusion – It is a fundamentalist challenge.

D.    Where is the major concentration of the Wahabis in the World?

  1. Mostly in the Arabian Peninsula
  1. In Pakistan/Afghanistan
  1. In Indonesia
  1. Smaller proportions exist in Sudan, Gulf countries

Saudi Arabia 

It is the home of all firebrands Wahabis. Since they are allied to the ruling princes, hence their influence with in the Saudi society is the greatest.

To repeat, all this has been financed using Petro-dollars under the very nose of USA.


General Zia Ul Haq, the eighties dictator of Pakistan was the first convert to Wahabism in Pakistan. He imported the Wahabi philosophy to drive the Soviets out of Afghanistan. His other motive was to drive India out of Kashmir under the pretext of freedom struggle.

Zia aligned himself with the local Mullahs and invited Saudi aid to build Saudi style madarssas and other religious infrastructure. The famous Binori Madarssa in Karachi, Pakistan has been built with Saudi aid. It can boast of having Osama bin Laden, Daniel Pearl’s murders as its graduates.

The greatest damage General Zia did was to the Pakistani army. He instituted Madarssa graduate recruitment into the army. Army officers were promoted on the basis their religious beliefs. In this way he hoped that Pakistani Army would become “defenders of the faith”.  In order to ensure that his successors are Wahabi, General Zia ensured that bright young army officers are posted in Saudi Arabia in a Pakistani sponsored army mission in eighties. Current crop of senior army officers in Pakistan are all Wahabis.

For Pakistani Army, like Saudi Arabian princes, 9/11 gutted a carefully constructed strategy. Things, which US did not wish to get involved, previously became issues of the day.


Indonesia is a Muslim country with a gentle form of Islam practiced for the last 400 to 500 years. Its post Dutch independence leaders like Sukarno, Suharto etc. were secular in their dealings. Until 1966, it had the largest Communist Party outside Soviet Union and China. Then why has militant Islam emerged in Indonesia? The answer lies in the economic failure of the politicians giving Mullah’s an opportunity aided by monies from Saudi Arabia. This was further aided by Afghan war which has let Osama bin Laden to establish contact with the local Mullahs.

Wahabi movements are strong in Sudan, Egypt and all of Gulf countries except Iran. The latter follows the Shia version of Islam, hence runs a foul with Al Wahab’s teachings.

E.     Why is Wahabism on a Collision course with the West and Others? 

Wahabis stayed in the background after WWII. They were thankful to the West for providing them help in exploring and exploiting its oil wealth.  The problem first started with the Israel – Palestinian conflict. It galvanized the Mullahs and they began to preach anti Semitism, anti west and anti infidel message.

Second and more important cause of galvanizing Wahabis was the importing of the decadent western values (according to Wahabis) from the West. Oil revenues enriched the Saudi Arabian society. They traveled into the West and acquired modern amenities. Moral values suffered at the expense of Islamic teachings. Arrival of large number of workers from the west to exploit the oil wealth and to build and maintain their new cities further exasperated an already critical Mullah community. 

Third, the Afghan War and preaching of Jehad against the Soviets further offered opportunity to the Wahabi Mullahs to take on a political stance more boldly. Princes in power supported it; hence the state and the religion combined their resources to meet the challenge of Jehad.

Fourth, the Gulf War I, resulted in a significant presence of American and British on the Arabian Soil. The former felt that it is a necessity to keep Saddam Hussain under control. The Saudi Arabian Mullahs felt it otherwise. They considered their presence, as an occupation of their sacred soil. USA, which had portrayed itself as liberator of Kuwait became occupiers of their holy land. They plotted to get rid of Americans from their soil and gain complete independence from the West’s economic hold on them.

Lastly, oil wealth provided them an opportunity to run an independent foreign policy with or without ruling princes’ approval by directly supporting Madrssas all over the Muslim world. With this they could preach Jihad on a minor pretext e.g. Jihad for the Palestinian cause, Jihad to get Soviets now Russians out of Chechnya, Jihad to get Kashmir liberated, Jihad to expel Americans out of Arabia etc.

All the above causes have now galvanized Wahabis into action. A major strike at WTC was there first such major act. Many more are threatened. God forbids, if they do succeed in acquiring crude nuclear technology, threat to the rest of the world will be the greatest.

F.      What do we do to eliminate this Ever Present Threat? 

Former British allies, turned enemies have grabbed the world headlines especially after 9/11. Prior to that, their support for East Africa bombing, USS Cole bombing brought them into the limelight. Osama bin Laden is one of the Wahabi who undertook all the aforementioned acts. In India, Chechnya, Philippines Muslim terror threat is ever present for worthless causes. West is now paying attention to Arabia because majority of the 9/11 terrorists hailed from there.

There is a little US can do directly to the policy making in Saudi Arabia. Indirectly they may be able to influence a few key princes in power to:

  1. Limit the amount of monies, which Wahabis get under the pretext of upkeep of holy places.
  1. Modify the school system in Arabia, Pakistan, Indonesia and elsewhere to prevent the Wahabis from affecting the young minds.
  1. Close down some of the premier Madarssas in above countries and replace them with better schools of study and learning.
  1. Mullahs to be relieved of their duties if they preach Jehad in Mosques and other places.
  1. Hajj is not to be used to recruit and indoctrinate people for worthless Jehadi causes.
  1. No monies outside Saudi Arabia’s border are to be handed over to the local religious charities. No matter what the cause.
  1. Israel- Palestine, Chechnya-Russia, India-Pakistan, Bosnia -Serbs are to be treated as bilateral local issues. Calls for recruits to join in the fight are to be thoroughly discouraged.
  1. Guerilla Fighters in Philippines, Talibaan in Afghanistan etc. are not to be given monetary or technical aid under any pretext.
  1. The West and US develop a policy of slowly disengaging from Arabian oil supply.
  1. No political support locally or in any world forums to be given to movements which have smiling face on one side and terrorist face on the other.

In the end, I must say, Wahabis are here to stay. Only Arabian government can control them. West can only help to reshape their education and prevent monies transferred to other countries to galvanize masses there. To end Muslim terrorism, the West has to influence Saudi policy. Only the latter can control the Wahabi influence in the Kingdom and outside it.

(The author is a retired Vice President from C-I-L Inc. and has lived in Canada for the past 34 years. A graduate of Punjab University and University of Missouri; Rolla, USA, the author is a former investment strategies analyst and international relations manager. The Views expressed are his own. email-




Posted in Siapa Wahabi on September 20, 2006 by bankwahabi





Muhammad Ibn Abd al-Wahab ( the founder of Wahabism ) born in Uyaina village near the town of Humrailmila in the Najd desert in 1111 A.H ( 1699 ) and died in 1206 ( 1792 ) . Formerly with the idea of trading, he went to Basra, Baghdad, Iran, India and Damascus, where he won the name � Shaikh an-Najdi � due to his clever and aggressive attitude. He saw and learnt a great deal at these places and set his heart on the idea of becoming a chief. He had thought it proper to found a new tariqa to reach his goal, and, in preparation for this goal, attended the lectures of the Hanbali Ulama in the blessed city of Medina and later in Damascus for some time. When he went back to the Najd, he wrote pamphlets on religious subjects for villagers. He added his own ideas which he took from the Mu�tazila and other groups of bid�a. Many ignorant villagers, particularly the inhabitants of Dar�iyya and their ignorant chief, Muhammad ibn Sa�ud, followed him. The Arabs esteemed ancestral distinctions very highly, and because he did not belong to a well-known family, he used Muhammad ibn Sa�ud as a tool to disseminate his tariqa which he named Wahabism. He introduced himself as the Qadi ( Head of the religious affaires ) and Muhammad ibn Sa�ud as the Hakim ( Ruler ) . ��������..

His father Abd al-Wahhab , who was a pious ,pure Alim in Medina , his brother Sulaiman ibn abd al �wahab and his teachers advised him to correct his ideas and advised the Muslims to avoid him, as they thought that his heretic beliefs would harm Islam from the inside in the future. Soon he started disseminating his heretical ideas openly under the name of Wahabism������..

The ignorant , the unemployed, raiders, ignoramuses, opportunists and hard �hearted soon assented to his ideas and took their part on his side and regarded the pious Muslims of the right path as disbelievers�����..

In 1143 ( 1730 ), Muhammad ibn Sa�ud and Muhammad ibn Abd al-wahhab hand in hand arrived at the conclusion that those who not accept Wahabism were disbelievers and polytheists, and that it was halal to kill them and confiscate their possessions, and publicly announced their declaration seven years later. Then Ibn Abd-al Wahab started fabricating ijtihad when he was thirty-two years old and announced his false ijtihads at the age of forty.


All the shrines of as-Sahabat al-kiram, Ahl al-Bait, Awliya and Martyrs ( radi-Allahu ta�ala anhum ajma�in) except that of our Rasulullahi Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam , were destroyed when Sa�ud ibn Abd al-Aziz attacked Mecca and Medina. The grave became indistinct. Although they attempted to pull down Rasuluhhah�s shrine , too, those who took hold of pickaxes either went mad or suffered paralysis, and they were not able to commit that crime.

When they captured Medina Ibn Sa�ud assembled Muslims and, slandering them , said, �Your religion is now completed by Wahhabism, and Allah became pleased with you. Your fathers were disbelievers and polytheists. Do not follow their religion ! Tell everybody that they were disbelievers ! It is forbidden to stand and beg in front of Rasulullah�s shrine. You may only say �As-salamu ala Muhammad � when passing by the shrine. He is not be asked for intercession.�


Abd al �Aziz ibn Muhammad, who ruthlessly massacred Muslims in order to disseminate Wahabism, sent three Whahbis to Mecca in 1210 A.H ( 1795) . The Ulama of Ahl as-Sunna responded to them with ayats and hadiths and the Wahabite representatives could not make any rejoinder. They could not find any way out but to admit the truth.

The ulama of Ahl as-Sunna silenced the Wahabis and prepared and signed a declaration containing the ayats and hadihs which showed that Wahabism was a path different from Islam, a trap insidiously set up by the enemies of Islam to demolish Islam from the inside. The three wahabis who repented of their beliefs ratified this document. The copies of the declaration were then sent to all Muslim countries.


Some Meccan Wahabis went to Abd al-Aziz , the ruler in Dariyya, and told him that the representatives could not refute the Meccan ulama and that a declaration stating that their system of belief was hostility against Islam was sent to every country. Abd al- Aziz ibn Muhammad ibn Saud and his followers , bitterly grudged against the Ahl as-Sunna, attacked Mecca in 1215. The Amir of Mecca, Sharif Ghalib ibn Musaid ibn said Effendi, resisted them. Much blood was shed on both sides. Sharif Ghalib Effendi did not allow them to enter Mecca, but the Arab tribes around Mecca accepted Wahabism. Between the two ids of the same year, Saud sent an army to the town of Taif. They oppressed and massacred Taifian Muslim women and children.

The torture of the inhabitants of Taif including women and children was committed by the order of an enemy of Islam, a ferocious brigand named Uthman al-Mudayiqi. This man and Muhsin had been sent by Sharif Ghalib Effendi to Dariyya. They were supposed to negotiate about the renewal of the earlier in order to prevent the Wahabis form besieging Medina and oppressing Muslims. But this hypocrite was a spy near Sharif Ghalib Effendi. He deceived his companion, Muhsin, on their way to Dariyya by promising him many advantages. The disclosed their thoughts to Saud ibn Abd al-Aziz in Dariyya. Saud, seeing that they were his faithful slaves, put his looters under their command. They went to the place name Abila near Taif and sent a letter to Sharif Ghalib Effendi writing that Saud and they, the two traitors, disregarded the validity of the former treaty and that Saud was preparing to besiege Mecca. Sharif Ghalib Effendi wrote answers advising them with soft words, but Uthman the ferocious, who was an enemy of Islam, tore up the letters. He attacked the Muslims sent by the Amir and defeated them.

Sharif Ghalib Effendi retreated into the Taif fortress and took measure of defense. This ferocious Wahabi encamped his army at Malis near Taif at the end of Shawal in 1217 A.H ( 1802 ). He also asked help of the vile Amir of Bisha, Salim ibn Shakban, who had a much harder stony heart full of enmity towards Islam. There ere about twenty desert shaikhs and each shaikh had about five hundred brigands in addition to one thousand under Salim�s own command.

Led by Sharif Ghalib Effendi (rahmat �Allahi alaihi ), the people of Taif bravely attacked the brigands at Malis. He put fifteen hundred looters of Salim ibn Shakban to the sword. Salim and those with him fled Malis. But they rallied together again and raided Malis. They looted the town. Sharif Ghalib Effendi went to Jidda to obtain military help. Most Taifians feared and secretly escaped with their household. Although those Taifians who took refuge in the fortress defeated the packs of Wahabis coming one after the other, they hoisted the white flag of truce, because the enemy continually received aid. They agreed to surrender under the condition that their lives and chastity would be safe. Though the enemy, too, had become weak for many of them had died or fled, the Taifian messenger, who was a base villain, though he saw the Wahabis flee, shouted after them, � Sharif Ghalib fled form fear ! And the Taifians do not have the power to resist you ! They sent me to communicate that they will surrender the fortress, and they ask you to forgive them. I like the Wahabis. Come back ! You have shed much blood ! It is not to go back without capturing Taif. I swear that Taifians will immediately surrender the fortress. They will accept whatever you want. �

It was Sharif Ghalib Efendi�s fault that Taif was lost in vain. If he had stayed in Taif, Muslim would not have suffered that doom. Since �Traitors are cowards � the Wahabis did not believe that the Taifians would surrender readily. But, seeing the flag of truce on the fortress, they sent an envoy to the fortress to investigate the situation. The Taifians, pulled the envoy up to the fortress with a rope. � Gather all your goods here and surrender if you want to save your lives, � said the envoy. All their possessions were gathered with the effort of a Muslim named Ibrahim. � This is not enough ! � said the envoy, � We cannot forgive you for this much. You should bring more ! � He gave them a note book and said, � List the names of those who do not give ! The men are free to go wherever they wish. The women and children will be put in chains. �. Although they begged him to be a little bit softer , he increased his aggression and harshness. Ibrahim, unable to be patient any more, hit him on the chest with a stone and killed him.

During this confusion, the Wahabbis attacked the fortress, thus they escaped from being hit by cannon balls and bullets. They broke the gates and entered the fortress. They killed every woman, man and child they saw, cutting even the babies in cradles. The street turned into floods of blood. They raided the houses and plundered everywhere, attacking outrageously and madly till sunset. They could not capture the stone houses in the eastern part of the fortress, so they besieged and put those houses under a shower of bullets. A Wahabite scoundrel shouted : � We forgive you ! You may go wherever you want with your wives and children, � but they did not yield. Meanwhile , the Wahabbis gathered the people, who had set out to migrate, on a hill and encircled those pure Muslim families , who had grown up amid fondling and affection and most of whom were women and children, and held them to die of hunger and thirst for twelve days, and tortured them by slandering , stoning and cudgeling. The Wahabbis called them one by one and beat them and said, � Tell us where you hide your possessions ! � and howled, � Your day of death is coming ! � to those who begged for mercy.

Ibn Shakban , after pressing the stone houses violently for twelve days and being unable to make them yield, promised that those who would come out of the houses and give up arms would be forgiven. Muslims believe him and came out, but, with their hands tied behind their back, they were drawn by Ibn Shakban to the hill were the other Muslims were encircled . Three hundred and sixty seven men together with women and children were put to the sword on the hill ( rahmat �Allahi alaihim ajma�in ). They make animals trample on the bodies of the martyrs and left them unburied to be eaten by beasts and birds of prey for sixteen days. They plundered Muslims houses and gathered all they took into a big heap in front of the gateway of the fortress and sent one fifth of the goods and the money they collected to Saud, sharing the remainder among themselves. The traitors and torrential rains swept away uncountable money and invaluable goods, and there remained little, only forty thousand gold rials, in the hands of Ahl as-Sunna; ten thousand riyals were distributed to the women and children, and the goods were sold very cheaply.


The Wahabbis tore up the copies of the Qur�an al-karim and books of Tafsir, Hadith and other Islamic books they took from libraries, Musjids and houses and threw them down on the ground. They made sandals from the gold-gilded leather covers of the Qur�an copies and other books and wore them on their filthy feet. There were ayats and other sacred writings on those leather covers. Leaves of those valuable books thrown around were so much that there was no space to step in the streets of Taif. Although Ibn Shakban had ordered the looters not to tear up the copies of the Qur�an al-karim, the Wahabite bandits , who were gathered from the deserts for looting and who did not know the Qur�an al-karim, tore up all the copies they found and stamped on them. Only three copies of the Qur�an al-karim and one copy of the Sahih of al-Bukhari were saved form plunder in the big town of Taif.


The weather was calm during the plunder of Taif. There was no wind. A storm broke out after the bandits went away, and the wind lifted up all the leaves of the Qur�an al-karim and Islamic books and swept them away. Soon there was no piece of paper left on the ground. Nobody knew where they were taken.

Under the hot sun, the corpses of the martyrs decayed on the hill in sixteen days. The atmosphere became fetid. Muslim begged, wept and lamented in front of Ibn Shakban to permit them to bury their dead relatives. At last he agreed, and they dug two big hollows, put all the decayed corpses of their fathers, grandfathers , relatives and children into the hollows and covered them with soil. There was no corpse that could be recognized ; some of them were only half or one fourth of a body, for other parts were scattered around by birds and beasts of prey.

They were permitted to collect and bury these pieces of flesh because the bad smell bothered the Wababbis, too. Muslims searched all around and collected and buried them, too, in the tow hollows.

It was also for the purpose of insulting and taking revenge on the dead Muslims that the bandits kept the martyrs unburied until they decayed . But, as said in a couplet ,

�It will bring ascent, do not grieve that you have fallen, A building is not restored before it turns to a ruin �

The status of martyrs ( R.A. ajma�in ) in Allah�s esteem increases when their corpses are left unburied to decay and to be prey for birds and beasts.

source : Advice for the Muslim Sixth Edition �1989 Published by : Hakikat Kitabevi Waqf Ikhlas Publication Darussefaka Cad . No. 57/A PK . 35 Fatih Istanbul � Turkey

Basheer PB Vellarakkad
-, Abu Dhabi, U.A.E .


The Wahhabi Threat To Islam

Posted in Siapa Wahabi on September 20, 2006 by bankwahabi


The Wahhabi Threat To Islam

By Mona Eltahawy
Sunday, June 6, 2004; Page B07

When gunmen killed 22 people in the city of Khobar in Saudi Arabia’s oil-rich eastern province last weekend, they set off alarm bells in international oil markets. But louder bells should be ringing throughout the Muslim world over the cost to Islam of this conflict between the Saudi royal family and the Wahhabi zealots it helped create and who now vow to overthrow it.


Islam was born in what is now Saudi Arabia. King Fahd calls himself “Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques” in Mecca and Medina, which millions of Muslim pilgrims visit every year. If oil has been Saudi Arabia’s trump card on the international stage, then Islam has given it plenty of cachet on the Muslim one.

So when those gunmen in Khobar tell terrified foreign oil workers they are looking for “infidels” during an hours-long shooting spree that leaves 22 dead, including a 10-year-old Egyptian schoolboy, and claim that it is in the name of Islam that they drag the corpse of a 62-year-old Briton through the streets and slit the throats of nine hostages, the Muslim world cannot be silent. It is long past time for Muslims to question the Wahhabi ideology that is pulling the rug out from under Saudi life, for it is that same ideology that has been involved in militant movements throughout the Muslim world for years.

I lived in Saudi Arabia for six years in the 1980s and know how all-pervasive Wahhabism is. It was there in posters that lined the corridors of my women-only university showing how a “good Muslim woman” should dress — in black from head to toe — and it made sure that gender apartheid kept those same good Muslim women in the back two rows of the bus.

It was there in shopping malls patrolled by morality police ready to arrest shopkeepers who didn’t close their stores for prayer time and it was there in the grim Friday evening news tally of the day’s public beheadings.


And it is there today, clearly, in the issues that occupy the time of Saudi clerics. Two weeks before the Khobar rampage, a young Saudi friend forwarded me a copy of a fatwa, or religious ruling, issued by Saudi Arabia’s senior clerics. It was a fatwa banning the giving of flowers when visiting the sick in the hospital. “It is not the habit of Muslims to offer flowers to the sick in hospital. This is a custom imported from the land of the infidels by those whose faith is weak. Therefore it is not permitted to deal with flowers in this way, neither to sell, to buy nor to offer them as gifts,” the fatwa said.

Wahhabi militants operate in that chasm between the mind-set that bans flowers for the sick and life as we know it in 2004. Osama bin Laden may be Wahhabism’s most recognizable face but it does not lack for followers or hatred, and not just for the “infidels” — women and non-Wahhabis are equally derided.

While there is little doubt that the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza and now the U.S. occupation of Iraq fuel many a militant’s fire in the Middle East, Wahhabi Islam can be found in most of the embers.

The Saudi royal family has its own reckoning to do with Wahhabism. By giving Wahhabis a free hand over Saudi Arabia’s religious and educational sectors, the royal family guaranteed the showdown. Instead of fostering a liberal and intellectual class that despises the Wahhabis and could have been an important ally against them, the Saudi government instead imprisons those calling for liberal reform.

Last year, Crown Prince Abdullah brought together Saudi intellectuals, including women and members of the country’s Shiite minority, to debate much-needed reform as an antidote to Wahhabism run amok, but every discussion of reform is tempered with the caveat: “It cannot be too fast.”

What is “too fast” when militants carry out two audacious attacks within a month against expatriates in the oil sector? What is too fast when their car bombings kill Saudis and non-Saudis, Muslims and non-Muslims alike?

“I am scared,” a Saudi man told me after the Khobar attacks. “There is no clear vision to where my country is heading. We want to progress, but we also want to live like the good Muslims did 1,400 years ago. We want to change, but we believe that change is the road to hell. We want the people to have a role in leading the country, but we don’t want democracy. We want to have dialogue with the West, but our preachers are preaching every Friday that all westerners, or non-Muslims, go to hell.”

The Muslim world must speak up not only for its religion but for Saudis caught between the rock of the royal family and its absolute rule and the hard place of the Wahhabis and their unforgiving Islam.

Mona Eltahawy is managing editor of Arabic Women’s eNews and a columnist for the London-based newspaper Asharq al-Awsat.


Jika anada mahu kenali golongan atau Individu atau website Wahabi/Salafi/Kaum Muda/Pembid’ah/Pensyirikkan org/ di Malaysia

Posted in Siapa Wahabi on September 4, 2006 by bankwahabi

Sahabat sekalian, Jika anda mahu kenali golongan atau Individu atau website  Wahabi/Salafi/Kaum Muda/Pembid’ah/Pensyirikkan org/ di Malaysia, boleh lah sahaja emailkan pada saya….
Sahabat Ku,
adakah anda masih ingat sejarah penentangan kaum tua terhadap kaum muda pada awl 1940an???jika ingat bagus..
tapi adakah anda tahu kenapa golongan tua bertindak sedemikian dan siapakah golongan tua dan muda ini…..
Kaum Tua=Ulamak2 pondok yg kekal dgn fahaman tradisional…
Kaum Muda= Ustaz/pelajar2 yg baru dan masih mentah dlm ilmu2 agama yg pulang dari beberapa tempat dr tanah arab.Mereka yg berfahaman songsang /wahabai/ pembid’ah/ Pensyirikkan org/Salafi…
Kenapa Kaum Tua tentang???
sebab Kaum muda masih lagi tidak mantap dlm ilmu2 agama,tiba2 sibuk membid’ah kan masyaraka,mengsyirikkan masyarakat….
Apa dah jadi lepas itu???
oh, takkan tak tahu, Allah dah Berfirman lebih  1400 thn dahulu..yg maknanya lebih kurang begini”Perkara2 yg Batil/salah tidak akan kekal”…
kalau kita kaji semula ayat ini, Allah menggunkan fi’il madhi,so apa maksudnya??
kalau sahabat belajar nahu,balaghah paham lae..kalau tak paham/tahu belajar.
oh Begitu,jadi kenapa kaum/fahaman nie naik/merebak semula??
sbb Allah nak Orang Islam buat kerja Da’wah…
jadi janganlah risau dgn Kaum Wahabi Salafi nie…Yang penting kita jangan tinggalkan usaha membanteras mereka…..
Sahabat Ku,
kalau nak kenal sedikit sebanyak kaum ini,mereka tidak menghormati ulamak2 Islam yg muktabar,mereka tak benar2 mendalami ilmu2 agama,mereka tak ada Ihtiram/hormat pada Ahlul Bait/Mereka tidak menjaga kesan2/athar2 peninggalan Rasul kita yg tersayang,mereka berani merendah-rendahkan Ulamak muktabar,mereka hanya mengagung-agungkan tok syeikh2 mereka,tapi mereka marah kita agungkan syeikh2 kita yg muhtaram/terhormat,mereka menggunakan ayat2 suci Al-Quran dan hadith2 yg mulia dgn mengikut hawa nafsu mereka…
wallahu a’la wa a’lam…
semoga golongan wahabi/salafi diberikan Hidayah,keampunan dari Allah atas kesilapan meeka dalam memahami Ilmu2 agama..

Ramai yg kalut dlm mencari Al-Haq

Posted in Siapa Wahabi on September 4, 2006 by bankwahabi

Ramai yg kalut dlm mencari Al-Haq. Mereka lalai pada jalan yg sebenar yg telah Baginda Kekasih kita Penghulu Segala Anbiya’ Nabi Kita Muhammad Shallalahualaihi wasallam tunjukkan.

Sahabat Ku, siapakah yg layak dan patut kita rujuk dalam segala permasalahan dalam ilmu2 berkaitan Agama???..adakah cukup dgn hanya bergelar atau memiliki pangkat Dr.,Phd.,Proff,Master,Degree,ustaz,maulana,syeikh??…
Tidak sejuta kali tidak…Ukuran kita bukanlah itu semua, tetapi bagaimana seseorang itu beramal dengan ilmunya,bagaiman seseorang itu menghormati Ulamak2 terdahulu, badaimana seseorag itu amanah dgn ilmunya,bagaimana seseorg itu mengambil ilmunya dan dari siapakah ilmu itu diambil,bagaimana akhlaq seseorang itu terhadap orang yang berbeza pendapat dgn dia…..banyak lagi jika mahu dinyatakan ukurannya…
Sahabat Ku,
adakah yg sahabat ikuti dan agungkan itu semua lengkap dgn ukuran tersebut??? jika tidak,nyah lah mereka..jauhilah mereka..kerana mengambil ilmu2 agama dari org2 yg tidak memenuhi syarat2 tersebut boleh mendatangkan bala pada diri dan ummat Muhammad S.A.W…

Kenapa saya katakan begini??? sebab saya pergi pada satu kuliyyah ada seorg ust/Dr, kerap kali tidak hormat akan ulamak2 yg termasyhur dalam ilmu agama,kerap kali si ust itu merendahkan,meremehkan golongan2 yg sgt hebat dlm penguasaan ilmu2 agama…Adakah wajar kita namakan si ust itu ust???….
sahabat ku, hanya mereka yg Allah bukakan hati mereka sahaja dapat melihat Al-Haq,kerana Al-Haq itu cahaya yg tidak dapat bercampur baur dengan Al-Batil…Oleh itu berdoalah sahabatku agar Cahaya Al-Haq memenuhi jiwa kita..Allahumma Amin….

Ulama2 Islam seluruh dunia berbaris

Posted in Siapa Wahabi on September 3, 2006 by bankwahabi

Ulama2 Islam seluruh dunia berbaris mengecam dan memperingatkan ummat akan bahaya dan sesatnya aliran kalian ini (wahabi / salafi). Al-Sayyid Ahmad ibn Zayni (d. 1304/1886) Mufti Mekkah dan syaikhul Islam dan pemimpin agama tertinggi untuk daerah Hijaz dalam kitabnya Fitnat al-Wahhabiyyah menulis  hadist2 Nabi SAW telah sangat2 jelas menerangkan :

1. Fitnah itu datangnya dari sini, fitnah itu datangnya dari arah sini, sambil memberikan ke arah timur (Najed, tempat lahirnya dajjal muhammad bin abdul wahab – pen )

2. Akan ada dalam ummatku perselisihan dan perpecahan kaum yang indah perkataannya namun jelek perbuatannya. Mereka membaca Al Qur’an, tetapi keimanan mereka tidak sampai mengobatinya, mereka keluar dari agama seperti keluarnya anak panah dari busurnya, yang tidak akan kembali seperti tidak kembalinya anak panah ketempatnya. Mereka adalah sejelek-jelek makhluk, maka berbahagialah orang yang membunuh mereka atau dibunuh mereka. Mereka menyeruh kepada kitab Allah, tetapi sedikitpun ajaran Allah tidak terdapat pada diri mereka. Orang yang membunuh mereka adalah lebih utama menurut Allah. Tanda-tanda mereka adalah bercukur (Addarus Sunnia, pp/49)

3. Di Akhir zaman nanti akan keluar segolongan kaum yang pandai bicara tetapi bodoh tingkah lakunya, mereka berbicara dengan sabda Rasulullah dan membaca Al Qur’an namun tidak sampai pada kerongkongan mereka, meraka keluar dari agama seperti anak panah keluar dari busurnya, maka apabila kamu bertemu dengan mereka bunuhlah, karena membunuh mereka adalah mendapat pahala disisi Allah pada hari kiamat  (ada satu lagi yg panjang riwayat Ibnu Abbas dalam Shahih Bukhari yg menyebut Kaum ini sebagai dari Najed iaitu dalam Vol 4 Bk 55 No 558).

4. Kepala kafir itu seperti (orang yang datang dari) arah timur (najed), sedang kemegahan dan kesombongan (nya) adalah (seperti kemegahan dan kesombongan orang-orang yang) ahli dalam (menunggang) kuda dan onta.

5. Hati menjadi kasar, air bah akan muncul disebelah timur dan keimanan di lingkungan penduduk Hijaz (pada saat itu penduduk Hijaz terutama kaum muslimin Makkah dan Madinah adalah orang-orang yang paling gigih melawan profokator Wahabi dari sebelah timur / Najed – pen).

6. (Nabi s a w berdo’a) Ya Allah, berikan kami berkah dalam negara Syam dan Yaman, para sahabat berkata : Dan dari Najed, wahai Rasulullah, beliau berdo’a: Ya Allah, berikan kami berkah dalam negara Syam dan Yaman, dan pada yang ketiga kalinya beliau s a w bersabda : Di sana (Najed) akan ada keguncangan fitnah serta disana pula akan muncul tanduk syaitan (muhammad bin abdul wahab – pen). (Shahih Bukhari Vol 2 Bk 17 No 147 dan juga Vol 9 Bk 88 No 214)

7. Akan keluar dari arah timur (najed-pen) segolongan manusia yang membaca Al Qur’an namun tidak sampai membersihkan meraka. Ketika putus dalam satu kurun, maka muncul lagi dalam kurun yang lain, hingga adalah mereka yang terakhir bersama-sama dengan dajjal.

mengenai sabda Nabi s a w yang mengisyaratkan bahwa akan ada dari arah timur (Najed – pen) keguncangan dan dua tanduk syaithon (Sahih al-Bukhari), maka sebagian besar ulama mengatakan bahwa yang dimaksud dengan dua tanduk syaithon itu tiada lain adalah Musailamah Al-Kadzdzab dan Muhammad bin abdul wahab.

Sebagian ahli sejarah menyebutkan peperangan BANY HANIFAH, mengatakan : Di akhir zaman nanti akan keluar di negeri Musailamah seorang lelaki yang menyerukan agama selain agama Islam. Ada beberapa hadits yang didalamnya menyebutkan akan timbulnya fitnah, diantaranya adalah :

1. Darinya (negeri Musailamah dan Muhammad bin Abdul Wahab) fitnah yang besar yang ada dalam ummatku, tidak satupun dari rumah orang Arab yang tertinggal kecuali dimasukinya, peperangan bagaikan dalam api hingga sampai keseluruh Arab, sedang memeranginya dengan lisan adalah lebih sangat (bermanfaat – pen) daripada menjatuhkan pedang.

2. Akan ada fitnah yang menulikan, membisukan dan membutakan, yakni membutakan penglihatan manusia didalamnya sehingga mereka tidak melihat jalan keluar, dan menulikan dari pendengaran perkara hak, barang siapa meminta dimuliakan kepadanya maka akan dimuliakan.

3. Akan lahir tanduk syaithon dari Najed, Jazirah Arab akan goncang lantaran fitnahnya (shahih Muslim volume 4 no’s 6938+, hadist dengan pengertian yang sama juga ditemukan di Shahih Muslim volume 1 no’s 83, juga Imam Nawawi dalam Sharh Shahih Muslim 2/29)

Al-Allamah Sayyid Alwi bin Ahmad bin Hasan bin Al-Quthub As-Sayyid Abdullah Al-Haddad Ba’Alawi didalam kitabnya :”Jalaa’uzh zhalaam fir rarrdil Ladzii adhallal ‘awaam” sebuah kitab yang agung didalam menolak faham wahabi, beliau r a menyebutkan didalam kitabnya sejumlah hadits, diantaranya ialah hadits yang diriwayatkan oleh Abbas bin abdul Muthalib r a sbb :

“Akan keluar di abad ke-12H nanti (muhammad bin abdul wahab lahir 1115 –H / tepat abad 12H) dilembah BANY HANIFAH seorang lelaki, tingkahnya seperti pemberontak, senantiasa menjilat (kepada penguasa Sa’ud – pen) dan menjatuhkan dalam kesusahan, pada zaman dia hidup banyak kacau balau, menghalalkan harta manusia, diambil untuk berdagang dan menghalalkan darah manusia, dibunuhnya manusia untuk kesombongan, dan ini adalah fitnah, didalamnya orang-orang yang hina dan rendah menjadi mulia (yaitu para petualang & penyamun digurun pasir – pen), hawa nafsu mereka saling berlomba tak ubahnya seperti berlombanya anjing dengan pemiliknya”.

Kemudian didalam kitab tersebut Sayyid Alwi menyebutkan bahwa orang yang tertipu ini tiada lain ialah Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab dari Tamim. Oleh sebab itu hadits tersebut mengandung suatu pengertian bahwa Ibnu Abdul Wahhab adalah orang yang datang dari ujung Tamim, dialah yang diterangkan hadits Nabi s a w yang diriwayatkan oleh Al-Buhari dari Abu Sa’id Al-Khudri r a bahwa Nabi s a w bersabda : “Sesungguhnya diujung negeri ini ada kelompok kaum yang membaca Al Qur’an, namun tidak sampai melewati kerongkongan mereka, mereka keluar dari agama seperti anak panah keluar dari busurnya, mereka membunuh pemeluk Islam dan mengundang berhala-berhala (Amerika, Inggeris dan kaum Zionis baik untuk penggalian minyak ,militer , atau yang lain- pen), seandainya aku menjumpai mereka tentulah aku akan membunuh mereka seperti dibunuhnya kaum ‘Ad.

Ada hadits yang diriwayatkan oleh Abubakar R.A didalamnya disebutkan BANY HANIFAH, kaum Musailamah Al-Kadzdzab, Beliau s a w berkata : “Sesungguhnya lembah pegunungan mereka senantiasa menjadi lembah fitnah hingga akhir masa dan senantiasa terdapat fitnah dari para pembohong mereka sampai hari kiamat”.

Dalam riwayat lain disebutkan :

“Celaka-lah Yamamah, celaka karena tidak ada pemisah baginya” Di dalam kitab Misykatul Mashabih terdapat suatu hadits berbunyi sbb : “Di akhir zaman nanti akan ada suatu kaum yang akan membicarakan kamu tentang apa-apa yang belum pernah kamu mendengarnya, begitu juga (belum pernah) bapak-bapakmu (mendengarnya), maka berhati-hatilah jangan sampai menyesatkan dan memfitnahmu”.

Allah SWT telah menurunkan ayat Al Qur’an berkaitan dengan BANY TAMIM (Muhammad bin `Abdul Wahab bin Sulaiman bin Ali bin Muhammad bin Ahmad bin Rasyid bin Barid bin Muhammad bin al-Masyarif at-Tamimi) sbb : “Sesungguhnya orang-orang yang memanggil kamu dari luar kamar (mu) kebanyakan mereka tidak mengerti”. (QS. 49 Al-Hujurat : 4). (Imam Muhammad ibn Ahmad ibn Juzayy, al-Tashil [Beirut, 1403], p.702. See also the other tafsir works; also Ibn Hazm, Jamharat ansab al-‘Arab [Cairo, 1382], 208, in the chapter on Tamim).

Juga Allah SWT menurunkan ayat yang khitabnya ditujukan kepada mereka sbb : “Jangan kamu semua mengangkat suaramu diatas suara Nabi”. (QS. 49 Al-Hujurat 2)

Sayyid Alwi Al-Haddad mengatakan : “Sebenarnya ayat yang diturunkan dala kasus BANY HANIFAH dan mencela BANY TAMIM dan WA”IL itu banyak sekali, akan tetapi cukuplah sebagai bukti buat anda bahwa kebanyakan orang-orang Khawarij itu dari mereka, demikian pula Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab dan tokoh pemecah belah ummat, Abdul Aziz bin Muhammad bin Su’ud adalah dari mereka”.

Al-Allamah Syeikh Thahir Asy-Syafi’i, telah menulis kitab menolak faham wahabi ini dengan judul : “AL-INTISHARU LIL AULIYA’IL ABRAR”. Dia berkata : “Mudah-mudahan lantaran kitab ini Allah memberi mafa’at terhadap orang-orang yang hatinya belum kemasukan bid’ah yang datang dari Najed (faham Wahabi / salafi), adapun orang yang hatinya sudah kemasukan maka tak dapat diharap lagi kebahagiannnya, karena ada sebuah hadits riwayat Buhari : ‘Mereka keluar dari agama dan tak akan kembali’. Sedang yang dinukil sebagian kecil ulama yang isinya mengatakan bahwa dia (Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab) adalah semata-mata meluruskan perbuatan orang-orang Najed, berupa anjuran terhadap orang-orang Badui untuk menunaikan sholat jama’ah, meninggalkan perkara-perkara keji dan merampok ditengah jalan, serta menyeru kemurnian tauhid, itu semua adalah tidak benar.

Diantara kekejaman dan kejahilan kaum Wahabi /salafi adalah meruntuhkan kubah-kubah diatas makam sahabat-sahabat Nabi s a w yang berada di Mu’ala (Makkah), di Baqi’ & Uhud (Madinah) semuanya diruntuhkan dan diratakan dengan tanah dengan mengunakan dinamit penghancur. Demikian juga kubah diatas tanah dimana Nabi s aw dilahirkan, yaitu di Suq al Leil di ratakan dengan tanah dengan menggunakan dinamit dan dijadikan tempat parkir onta, saat ini karena gencarnya desakan kaum muslimin international maka kabarnya dibangun perpustakaan. Benar-benar kaum Wahabi itu golongan paling jahil diatas muka bumi ini. Tidak pernah menghargai peninggalan sejarah dan menghormati nilai-nilai luhur Islam

Semula Alkubbatul Khadra atau kubah hijau dimana Nabi Muhammad s a w dimakamkan juga akan didinamit dan diratakan dengan tanah tapi karena ancaman international maka orang-orang biadab itu menjadi takut dan mengurungkan niatnya. Semula seluruh yang menjadi manasik haji itu akan dimodifikasi termasuk maqom Ibrahim akan digeser tapi karena banyak yang menentang termasuk Sayyid Almutawalli Syakrawi dari Mesir maka diurungkanya.

Kesukaan mereka menuduh golongan Islam yang tak sejalan dengan mereka dengan tuduhan kafir, syirik dan ahlil bid’ah, itulah ucapan yang didengung-dengungkan disetiap mimbar dan setiap kesempatan, mereka tak pernah mengakui jasa para ulama Islam manapun kecuali kelompok mereka sendiri. Di negeri kita mereka menaruh dendam dan kebincian mendalam kepada para Wali Songo , para habaib (keturunan arab dari anak cucu Nabi saw) , dan para kyai yang menyebarkan dan meng Islam kan penduduk indonesia.

Mereka mengatakan ajaran para wali itu masih kecampuran kemusyrikan Hindu dan Budha, padahal para Wali itu jasanya telah meng Islam kan 85 % penduduk negeri ini. Mampukah wahabi-wahabi itu meng Islam kan yang 15 % sisanya ? Mempertahankan yang 85 % dari terkapan orang kafir saja tak bakal mampu, apalagi mau menambah 15 % sisanya. Jika bukan karena Rahmat dan Karunia Allah SWT yang mentakdirkan para Wali Songo untuk berdakwa ke negeri kita tentu orang-orang yang asal bunyi dan menjadi corong/sumbang bicara kaum wahabi itu masih berada dalam kepercayaan animisme, penyembah berhala atau masih kafir lainnya (Naudzu Billah min Dzalik).

Claim Wahabi bahwa mereka penganut As-Salaf, As-Salafushsholeh dan Ahlussunnah wal Jama’ah serta sangat setia pada keteladanan sahabat dan tabi’in adalah omong kosong dan suatu bentuk penyerobotan HAK PATEN SUATU MAZHAB.

Oleh karena itu janganlah dipercaya kalau mereka mengaku-ngaku sebagai faham yang hanya berpegang pada Al Qur’an adan As-Sunnah serta keteladanan Salafushsholeh apalagi mengaku sebagai GOLONGAN YANG SELAMAT DSB, itu semua omong kosong dan kedok untuk menjual barang dagangan berupa akidah palsu yang disembunyikan. Sejarah hitam mereka dengan membantai ribuan orang di Makkah dan Madinah, Iraq, serta daerah lain di wilayah Hijaz (yang sekarang di namakan Saudi, suatu nama bid’ah karena nama negeri Rasulullah s a w diganti dengan nama satu keluarga kerajaan yaitu As-Sa’ud). Yang terbantai itu terdiri dari para ulama-ulama yang sholeh dan alim, anak-anak yang masih balita bahkan dibantai dihadapan ibunya.

Memang ada orang2 yang dibayar untuk mempublikasikan / mempropagandakan “kebaikan” madzhab dajjal wahabi / salafi ini , mereka itulah PARA PENDUSTA AGAMA yang telah menjual akhirat untuk dunia.

Tapi ulama2 ahlusunnah wal jamaah tidak tinggal diam. Mereka telah bersatu memberantas aliran sesat ini …

Berikut ini daftar nama2 Ulama2 ahlusunnah beserta kitab2nya yang menolak faham wahabi / salafi , dan memperingatkan ummat akan bahaya faham tersebut :

1. Al-Ahsa’i Al-Misri, Ahmad (1753-1826): beliau menulis kitab (tidak diterbitkan) khusus untuk menolak faham wahabi (salafi) . Putra beliau Shaykh Muhammad ibn Ahmad ibn `Abd al-Latif al-Ahsa’i juga menulis kitab dengan tujuan yang sama.

2. Al-Ahsa’i, Al-Sayyid `Abd al-Rahman : menulis 60 bait puisi, dimulai dengan bait : Badat fitnatun kal layli qad ghattatil aafaaqa, wa sha“at fa kadat tublighul gharba wash sharaqa (Fitnah telah datang seperti senja kala menutupi langit , dan menyebar luas mencapai timur dan barat)

3. Al-`Amrawi, `Abd al-Hayy, and `Abd al-Hakim Murad (Qarawiyyin University, Morocco): Al-tahdhir min al-ightirar bi ma ja’a fi kitab al-hiwar (“Warning Against Being Fooled By the Contents of the Book” – peringatan melawan pembodohan oleh kandungan kitab) oleh Ibn Mani`( sebuah debat dengan al maliki) an attack on Ibn `Alawi al-Maliki by a Wahhabi writer – sebuah serangan kepada Ibn `Alawi al-Maliki oleh penulis wahabi.

4. `Ata’ Allah al-Makki: al-sarim al-hindi fil `unuq al-najdi ["The Indian Scimitar on the Najdi's Neck"].

5. Al-Azhari, `Abd Rabbih ibn Sulayman al-Shafi`i .Penulis Sharh Jami’ al-Usul li ahadith al-Rasul, kitab dasar Usul al-Fiqh: Fayd al-Wahhab fi Bayan Ahl al-Haqq wa man dalla `an al-sawab, vol 4 – The author of Sharh Jami’ al-Usul li ahadith al-Rasul, a basic book of Usul al-Fiqh: Fayd al-Wahhab fi Bayan Ahl al-Haqq wa man dalla `an al-sawab, 4 vols. ["Allah's Outpouring in Differentiating the True Muslims From Those Who Deviated From the Truth"].

6. Al-`Azzami, `Allama al-shaykh Salama (d. 1379H): Al-Barahin al-sati`at ["bukti2 yang bersinar..."- "The Radiant Proofs..."].

7. Al-Barakat al-Shafi`i al-Ahmadi al-Makki, `Abd al-Wahhab ibn Ahmad: kitabnya menolak faham wahabi / salafi tidak dipublikasikan – unpublished manuscript of a refutation of the Wahhabi sect.

8. Al-Bulaqi, Mustafa al-Masri : telah menulis 126 bait pusi menentang wahabi berjudul: Samnudi’s “Sa`adat al-Darayn” – wrote a refutation to San`a’i’s poem in which the latter had praised Ibn `Abd al-Wahhab. It is in Samnudi’s “Sa`adat al-Darayn” and consists in 126 verses

9. Al-Buti, Dr. Muhammad Sa`id Ramadan (University of Damascus): Al-salafiyyatu marhalatun zamaniyyatun mubarakatun la madhhabun islami (salafiyyah adalah sebuah masa sejarah yang penuh berkah, bukan sebuah madzhab dalam Islam – “The Salafiyya is a blessed historical period not an Islamic school of law, Damascus: Dar al-fikr, 1988). Al-lamadhhabiyya akhtaru bid`atin tuhaddidu al-shari`a al-islamiyya – ["Non-madhhabism is the most dangerous innovation presently menacing Islamic law"] (Damascus: Maktabat al-Farabi, n.d)

10. Al-Dahesh ibn `Abd Allah, Dr. (Arab University of Morocco), ed. Munazara `ilmiyya bayna `Ali ibn Muhammad al-Sharif wa al-Imam Ahmad ibn Idris fi al-radd `ala Wahhabiyyat Najd, Tihama, wa `Asir – ["Scholarly Debate Between the Sharif and Ahmad ibn Idris Against the Wahhabis of Najd, Tihama, and `Asir"].

11. Dahlan, al-Sayyid Ahmad ibn Zayni (d. 1304/1886). Mufti Mekkah dan syaikhul Islam dan pemimpin agama tertinggi untuk daerah Hijaz (highest religious authority in the Ottoman jurisdiction). Kitab beliau : al-Durar al-saniyyah fi al-radd ala al-Wahhabiyyah (mutiara2 murni menjawab wahabi – “The Pure Pearls in Answering the Wahhabis”). Dan :Fitnat al-Wahhabiyyah ( fitnah wahabi – “The Wahhabi Fitna”); Khulasat al-Kalam fi bayan Umara’ al-Balad al-Haram ["The Summation Concerning the Leaders of the Sacrosanct Country"], a history of the Wahhabi fitna in Najd and the Hijaz.

12. Al-Dajwi, Hamd Allah: al-Basa’ir li Munkiri al-tawassul ka amthal Muhd. Ibn `Abdul Wahhab ["The Evident Proofs Against Those Who Deny the Seeking of Intercession Like Muhammad Ibn `Abdul Wahhab"].

13. Shaykh al-Islam Dawud ibn Sulayman al-Baghdadi al-Hanafi (1815-1881 CE): al-Minha al-Wahbiyya fi radd al-Wahhabiyya ["The Divine Dispensation Concerning the Wahhabi Deviation"]; Ashadd al-Jihad fi Ibtal Da`wa al-Ijtihad ["The Most Violent Jihad in Proving False Those Who Falsely Claim Ijtihad"].

14. Al-Falani al-Maghribi, al-Muhaddith Salih: menulis buku besar jawaban2 ulama-ulama 4 madzhab dalam menangkal faham Wahabi/salafi. authored a large volume collating the answers of scholars of the Four Schools to Muhammad ibn `Abd al-Wahhab.

15. Al-Habibi, Muhammad `Ashiq al-Rahman: `Adhab Allah al-Mujdi li Junun al-Munkir al-Najdi (siksa Allah yang pedih kepada pembangkang gila dari najed – “Allah’s Terrible Punishment for the Mad Rejector From Najd”).

16. Al-Haddad, al-Sayyid al-`Alawi ibn Ahmad ibn Hasan ibn al-Qutb Sayyidi `Abd Allah ibn `Alawi al-Haddad al-Shafi`i: al-Sayf al-batir li `unq al-munkir `ala al-akabir (pedang yang tajam untuk leher pembangkang imam2 besar – “The Sharp Sword for the Neck of the Assailant of Great Scholars”].. Juga kitab setebal 100 halaman yang tidak dipublikasikan berjudul: Misbah al-anam wa jala’ al-zalam fi radd shubah al-bid`i al-najdi al-lati adalla biha al-`awamm ( lampu ummat manusia dan cahaya penerang pada kegelapan berkenaan dengan sanggahan pada kerusakan dan bid’ah dari najed yang mana dia telah menyesatkan orang2 awam – “The Lamp of Mankind and the Illumination of Darkness Concerning the Refutation of the Errors of the Innovator From Najd by Which He Had Misled the Common People”].

17. Al-Hamami al-Misri, Shaykh Mustafa: Ghawth al-`ibad bi bayan al-rashad – ["The Helper of Allah's Servants According to the Affirmation of Guidance"].

18. Al-Hilmi al-Qadiri al-Iskandari, Shaykh Ibrahim: Jalal al-haqq fi kashf ahwal ashrar al-khalq ["The Splendor of Truth in Exposing the Worst of People] (pub. 1355H).

19. Al-Husayni, `Amili, Muhsin (1865-1952). Kashf al-irtiyab fi atba` Muhammad ibn `Abd al-Wahhab ["The Dispelling of Doubt Concerning the Followers of Muhammad ibn `Abd al-Wahhab"]. [Yemen?]: Maktabat al-Yaman al-Kubra, 198?.

20. Ibn `Abd al-Latif al-Shafi`i, `Abd Allah: Tajrid sayf al-jihad `ala mudda`i al-ijtihad ["The drawing of the sword of jihad against the false claimants to ijtihad"]. The family of Ibn `Abd al-Razzaq al-Hanbali in Zubara and Bahrayn possess both manuscript and printed refutations by scholars of the Four Schools from Mecca, Madina, al-Ahsa’, al-Basra, Baghdad, Aleppo, Yemen and other Islamic regions.

21. Ibn `Abd al-Wahhab al-Najdi, `Allama al-Shaykh Sulayman (elder brother of Muhammad ibn `Abd al-Wahhab – kakak kandung dajjal muhammad ibn wahhab) ; al-Sawa’iq al-Ilahiyya fi al-radd ‘ala al-Wahhabiyya ( halilintar yang hebat dalam menjawab wahabi). ["Divine Lightnings in Answering the Wahhabis"]. Ed. Ibrahim Muhammad al-Batawi. Cairo: Dar al-insan, 1987. Offset reprint by Waqf Ikhlas, Istanbul: Hakikat Kitabevi, 1994. Prefaces by Shaykh Muhammad ibn Sulayman al-Kurdi al-Shafi`i and Shaykh Muhammad Hayyan al-Sindi (Muhammad Ibn `Abd al-Wahhab’s shaykh) to the effect that Ibn `Abd al-Wahhab is “dall mudill” (“misguided and misguiding”).

22. Ibn `Abidin al-Hanafi, al-Sayyid Muhammad Amin: Radd al-muhtar `ala al-durr al-mukhtar, Vol. 3, Kitab al-Iman, Bab al-bughat. ["Answer to the Perplexed: A Commentary on "The Chosen Pearl,"" Book of Belief, Chapter on Rebels]. Cairo: Dar al-Tiba`a al-Misriyya, 1272 H.

Ibn `Afaliq al-Hanbali, Muhammad Ibn `Abdul Rahman: Tahakkum al-muqallidin bi man idda`a tajdid al-din (sindiran tajam para muqallid kepada mereka yang menuntut pembaharuan agama).Sebuah kitab yang meliputi banyak hal yang mana membuktikan kesesatan wahabi/ salafi dan tidak bisa dijawab oleh dajjal muhammad ibn wahab dan pengikutnya. [Sarcasm of the muqallids against the false claimants to the Renewal of Religion]. A very comprehensive book refuting the Wahhabi heresy and posting questions which Ibn `Abdul Wahhab and his followers were unable to answer for the most part.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.